Photo by Sophie Park/Getty Images

Poisoned Ivies: The Inside Account of the Academic and Moral Rot at America's Elite Universities, by Rep. Elise Stefanik (Simon & Schuster, 256 pp., $29)

Bureaucracies have a way of normalizing the absurd. For two years after October 7, I navigated a Princeton campus replete with rule-breaking protests, defaced buildings, and courses more interested in ideology than truth. I was called an inbred swine and a facilitator of a Palestinian genocide, and my friends were told to “Go back to Europe.” Yet Princeton and its peer institutions convened countless board meetings, expended millions on crisis management and legal fees, forced custodial staff to scrub away evidence of vandalism, and issued frequent statements—all to convince students like me that everything is fine, nothing to see here.

In her debut book, Poisoned Ivies, Representative Elise Stefanik offers the first comprehensive historical record of these occurrences. As a Harvard alumna serving on the House Education and Workforce Committee, she has the pedigree to understand this academic degeneration and the political will to expose it. She writes to reassure normal Americans that we weren’t the crazy ones and that our universities can once again become great institutions.

Stefanik anchors her diagnosis of elite American academia in the now-infamous congressional hearings during which she pressed the presidents of Harvard, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania until they admitted that endorsing the genocide of Jews did not necessarily violate their institutions’ codes of conduct. Drawing on statistical data, documentary evidence, and individual stories, Stefanik demonstrates that this sort of “academically lazy moral bankruptcy” is entrenched across the elite universities and within the bureaucracy of each school.

It’s easy to get lost in Stefanik’s “catalog of horrors,” but her accounts reveal four types of institutional deterioration: financial dependencies, administrative double standards, faculty radicalization, and physical violence.

At Harvard, for example, she highlights the $1.5 billion in foreign funding flowing into the university from Qatar, effectively subsidizing the anti-Western radicalism that has captured the campus. Administrative double standards are glaring at Northwestern, where leadership stunningly capitulated to a pro-Hamas encampment, rewarding rule-breakers with a seat at the table. Faculty radicalization is evident at Cornell, where Professor Russell Rickford publicly celebrated the October 7 massacre, calling it “exhilarating” to watch (before quietly resuming his place in the classroom). Physical violence materialized at Columbia when Students for Justice in Palestine invaded Hamilton Hall and barricaded janitors inside with bike chains.

Stefanik’s accomplishment is not merely her offering this historical account of campus chaos, but meticulously tying together the threads of how we arrived at this moment—and how we can move past it. She identifies billions in untracked foreign funding, bloated DEI bureaucracies, and the proliferation of student visas as the drivers of this institutional decay. She then outlines a formidable policy agenda to halt “the revolving door of a broken higher education system.” Her legislative blueprint includes capping foreign student attendance, freezing billions in research grants to schools that refuse to cooperate with federal law, and invoking Title VI to strip accreditation from schools that foster hostile environments for Jewish students.

Poisoned Ivies could have made an even stronger case by pulling its raw evidence to the forefront. Though Stefanik provides references and links to helpful graphs and visual evidence in the book’s endnotes, tighter integration of those primary sources into the main text would further cement the reality of what she describes.

Stefanik’s focus on institutional failure leaves prospective students and families wondering if the Ivy League is even worth attending anymore. As a recent graduate, my advice to high school seniors is not to cross these schools off their lists, particularly if the would-be applicants are courageous and willing to pursue truth independently. I know firsthand that free-thinking students can still navigate the nonsense and emerge with a world-class education, finding refuge in sanctuaries like the James Madison Program at Princeton, which Stefanik rightly praises. Life in the modern Ivy League is defined both by this pervasive administrative rot and the pockets of resilient students who still manage to thrive within it.

Nonetheless, Stefanik’s book provides a sobering reality check about how entrenched “the machine for ideological indoctrination” truly is. While a motivated undergraduate might win a single free-speech battle or force his university to clamp down on a discriminatory faculty member, the machine is simply too powerful for students to dismantle alone.

That makes Poisoned Ivies essential reading not just for policymakers and prospective students, but for ordinary Americans seeking to understand what went wrong in higher education. Stefanik has shown how universities have abandoned their commitments. It’s up to the American people and lawmakers to get them back on a more constructive path.

Donate

City Journal is a publication of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research (MI), a leading free-market think tank. Are you interested in supporting the magazine? As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, donations in support of MI and City Journal are fully tax-deductible as provided by law (EIN #13-2912529).

Further Reading