Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed
Main Error Mesage Here
More detailed message would go here to provide context for the user and how to proceed

City Journal

Close Nav

Health-Care Demagoguery

from the magazine

Health-Care Demagoguery

New York’s health-care lobby is up to its old tricks. Spring 2003
Politics and law
New York
Economy, finance, and budgets

New York State’s powerful health-care lobby has launched an irresponsible advertising campaign that warns of dire consequences if Governor George Pataki proceeds with his plans to cut the state’s bloated Medicaid system by about $1 billion. The handiwork of a coalition that includes the Greater New York Hospital Association and the Health Care Workers Union 1199, the campaign centers on an over-the-top TV ad showing a mother racing to a hospital emergency room, only to find it closed. The message: any cuts to the Medicaid system will leave New Yorkers without crucial care.

New York’s health-care lobby has long made these kinds of exaggerated prophecies, which never seem to materialize. When then-governor Mario Cuomo proposed Medicaid cuts back in 1991, as the state faced a steep recession, Hospital Association head Kenneth Raske predicted “a vast destruction of the health care system.” Even more irresponsibly, he warned: “People will die because of these proposals.”

What happened? The state achieved about $600 million in Medicaid savings, and nothing like the predicted disaster occurred. In fact, over the next three years, Gotham’s private hospitals, which form the bulk of the Hospital Association membership, added about 10,000 workers, a 7 percent gain—hardly suggesting an industry facing financial ruin.

The health-care lobby turned to scare tactics again in 1995, when Pataki proposed to deregulate prices for hospital procedures. By allowing insurers and hospitals to negotiate rates directly with one another, Pataki’s plan would drive down rates so far that it would be “like an avalanche overnight,” Raske claimed. “There will be major dislocation.”

Pataki went ahead with the reform anyway—but no “avalanche” followed, “overnight” or otherwise. Far from letting HMOs pressure them into lowering rates unreasonably, hospitals banded together, forming muscular negotiating groups that then gained the upper hand in the market, demanding higher rates and on-time payments from insurers.

The latest ad campaign proves once again that, for the state’s health-care lobby, no amount of funding is ever enough. Just three years ago, after health-care advocates spent $13 million on an ad campaign pushing for new Medicaid spending, Pataki dedicated more than $9 billion of New York’s share of the federal tobacco settlement to the Medicaid system. Not content with that porcine sum, the lobby demanded yet more, so last year Pataki pledged another $2.7 billion to help pay for private-sector hospital workers’ raises. Now barely a year later, the lobbyists are back with their usual fear-mongering, trying to stop Pataki from cutting what amounts only to a portion of the vast sums he recently added to the system.

Even before Pataki poured new billions into health care, New York had the most expensive Medicaid system in the U.S.—spending more than twice as much per patient as other big states like California because it pays for so many nonessential services. It’s a crippling burden on the state and local economy. Sooner or later, New Yorkers must say “enough,” and stop believing the health-care lobby’s sky-is-falling nonsense.


Up Next
eye on the news

Lobbying Takes to the Airwaves

Why groups that depend on the taxpayers are running scare ads. Steven Malanga April 1, 2003


Send a question or comment using the form below. This message may be routed through support staff.