City Journal Winter 2016

Current Issue:

Winter 2016
Table of Contents
Tablet Editions
Click to visit City Journal California

By Theodore Dalrymple

The New Vichy Syndrome: Why European Intellectuals Surrender to Barbarism.

Eye on the News

Theodore Dalrymple
Who Needs Parents?
Britain’s latest effort to undermine the family
August 12, 2004

Last week, the British Department of Health, with the blessing of the “ethicists” of the British Medical Association, decreed that girls under 16 may—and indeed should—have abortions without their parents’ knowledge. The girls, health officials reason, have the capacity to decide for themselves whether abortion is right for them; and if they decide it is, they also have the right to medical confidentiality.

No one seemed to notice that this decree stood in stark contradiction to the legal age of consent for sexual relations, which remains 16. According to current law, every pregnancy to a girl under 16 results from a crime, for which men still occasionally go to prison. The law sets the age of consent at 16 because it assumes that until that age most children do not have sufficient maturity to enter sexual relations, with all their emotional and social complexity and consequences. Children under 16, in short, still need some protection.

The Department of Health ruling all but admits this point, for while it insists on an under-aged girl’s right to have an abortion without her parents’ knowledge, it also suggests that the doctor performing the abortion would be wise to tell some adult or another connected with the girl—or at least the social services.

Here we see the real purpose of this ruling. It is not to serve the interests of the girls who have the abortions but to undermine the family still further—to end it as the primary locus of responsibility for the socialization of children. After all, if girls under 16 were truly “autonomous,” to use the cant word favored by contemporary bioethicists, why should any adult be told about her abortion? Nearly a decade and a half after the downfall of the Soviet Union, therefore, the British state wants to replace parents with itself, to insinuate its agents into the most intimate aspects of the life of its citizens. Parents are the great obstacles to this goal. And at a time when health officials can make such a ruling, the number of people on the public payroll is of course rising inexorably.

A girl of 14 who wanted an abortion greeted the news of the ruling with relief. “If my mother knew,” she reportedly said, “she’d kill me.” A nation that can take such childish relief seriously as a guide to its ethics or its policy on so serious a matter is a nation in serious trouble.

respondrespondTEXT SIZE
If you enjoyed
this article,
why not subscribe
to City Journal? subscribe Get the Free App on iTunes Or sign up for free online updates: