Sent by Richard Emerman on 02-18-2007:
Harvard was called the "Kremlin on the Charles" when I arrived there as a freshman in '67 (and for years before that, I believe). By the time I escaped in '71, it was my personal goal to relearn how to write an intelligible sentence. I soon learned more about public policy questions, arguments, and evidence, during one year working in the Alaska State budget office than I ever learned at Harvard. Since campus orthodoxy has been so rigid for so long, perhaps there is more promise in the continuing slide of these institutions into irrelevance than in their internal reform.
Sent by Robert H. Weir on 02-10-2007:
Thank you for "telling it like it is." I'm Harvard College '44 and Harvard Law School '48. It's not a women's issue. It's just a power grab by a small group. They are driving on someone else's gas. They can try to replace merit with good feelings, but it won't work. It will be obvious after the damage has been done.
The feminist takeover of Harvard is imminent. The Harvard Crimson reported yesterday that the university is about to name as its new president Drew Gilpin Faust, dean of the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study. Harvards Corporation, which is likely to recommend Faust to the universitys Board of Overseers for confirmation, could not have more clearly repudiated Lawrence Summerss all-too-brief reign of meritocracy and academic honesty, or more openly signaled that Harvard will now be the leader in politically correct victimology.
Faust runs one of the most powerful incubators of feminist complaint and nonsensical academic theory in the country. You can count on the Radcliffe Institutes fellows and invited lecturers to proclaim the constructed nature of knowledge, gender, and race, and to decry endemic American sexism and racism. Typical guest speakers include left-wing journalists Susan Faludi and Barbara Ehrenreich. At Radcliffe, Faludi argued that 9/11 had triggered yet another backlash against feminism, while Ehrenreich lectured on Weird Science: Challenging Sexist Ideology Since the 1970s. It is received truth among Radcliffe Institute lecturers that obstacles throughout American society block womens progress. Radcliffe speaker Rebecca Walker, for example, has created the I Spy Sexism initiative, which asks young women between the ages of 15 and 30 to keep logs of the sexism, racism, and homophobia that they see as they walk down the street or go to a movie.
With typical feminist hypocrisy, Faust has managed to wield massive power even as she rues female powerlessness. She headed the Task Force on Women Faculty, created after the firestorm over Summerss recklessly honest speculations about women in science, that strengthened the feminist hold on faculty hiring and promotions. The Task Force won a $50 million commitment to increase faculty diversity efforts at Harvard, notwithstanding that for decades the university has tied itself in knots trying to increase female and black faculty representation. Fausts Task Force also muscled into existence a remarkable new bureaucratic sinecure: the Senior Vice Provost for Diversity and Faculty Development. This new official sits with the president, the provost, and the deans of faculties, in order to push diversity quotas in every corner of the universitys academic operations. Naturally, Harvard gave the new position to one of Fausts two co-chairs on the Task Force: Evelyn Hammonds, a professor of the history of science, and of African and African-American studies, who specializes in discerning bias against minority women in science and medicine. (Please do not question how Hammondss unobstructed rise through the most elite American universities comports with her thesis of pervasive discrimination against black women.)
Should the Board of Overseers confirm Faust, the Senior Vice Provost for Diversity that she created will be even more redundant than before. Expect a constant push for ever greater female and minority representation throughout the university, backed up by academic research showing widespread discrimination against those favored beneficiariesresearch unclouded by the fact that women now run many of the nations most prestigious universities. Asked whether her appointment showed that gender inequities were ending at Harvard, Faust responded: Of course not. There is a lot of work still to be done, especially in the sciences, reports the New York Times. Unbiased inquiry into why certain groups may not enjoy proportional representation in scientific and technical fields, of the sort that Summers engaged in to his demise, will be even more proscribed. This triumph of feminist ideology is a tragedy not just for Harvard, but for the American academic world, which will undoubtedly follow Harvards lead in elevating feminist politics to premier intellectual standing.