![]() |
|
A quarterly magazine of urban affairs, published by the Manhattan Institute, edited by Brian C. Anderson.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • |
Ending Californias Numbers Game « Back to Story
Showing 14 Comment(s) Subscribe by RSSeatingdogfood April 02, 2013 at 3:46 PM If The Democrats Didn’t Give ” Sweetheart Deals ” To Your Public Service Union. Goon Employees To Get Reelected; You Would Have Plenty Of Money and The. Taxpayer would have Some Spare Change in His Pockets! Democratic Hustler Politicians + Corrupt Union Goons = BANKRUPTCY BABY! Time To Bring. RICO Conspiracy Charges Against The Hustler Corrupt Democrats and the. Criminal Unions! Kirk Gothier March 19, 2013 at 6:59 AM Ending California's Numbers Game will only happen with a clear accounting of what it costs to deliver essential services and infrastructure, and who benefits. Cherry picking employee costs, and demonizing teachers, police, fire fighters, water/sewer managers, road crews, etc. does not enable an informed discussion of these costs/benefits. Because almost all the use of these services is devoted to producing goods and services, moving them to market, and getting employees to and from work, a comprehensive cost/benefit analysis has to be related to compensation. Business Owners/CEO should pay based on their relative compensation rates, and employees should pay based on theirs. Until that accounting report is completed, spurious arguments and special interests will flourish. rogermortimer January 30, 2013 at 8:15 AM John CPA - I don't understand why you conclude the accounting changes are not a "big thing". This would only be true if there already was a sound general understanding by the public as to the extent of underfunding of pensions in California. I highly doubt there is a sound general understanding, and many who do understand the nature of this financial shipwreck engage in various forms of denial, cognitive dissonance, and evasiveness, just as the pointed out by Tough Love below. Really, once the public writ large understands, after the accounting changes, that all of the property tax budget (and likely then some) should go to government pensions, you think the impact will be no big deal? This means no money for schools, parks, public works, public safety, you name it. I am not a cpa, but believe strongly in the value of accurate accounting. The liberal indoctrinators in our universities don't teach it or are even aware of accounting principles, but the notion that a dollar of revenue and expense should be considered the same in Des Moines as it is in Sacramento or New York city is absolutely essential to support a market economy based on trust. Change the government accounting standards, and the public will have a much better picture as to what is going on. Hardly no big deal. Marten Purdy January 25, 2013 at 10:21 AM Political Ideology following the traits and beliefs of clowns. Clownism promotes cars with doors that fall off and a large production of custard pies as well as big red noses and silly clothes. Clownism isnt respected and isnt adopted by any country except there has been talk of all the worlds clowns uniting together and taking over Ohio in the U.S. they will take Ohio, rename it JOKEHIO and make its leader Bippo the Clown supreme lord. Jack Olson January 25, 2013 at 5:30 AM Robert Citron, Treasurer of Orange County, produced a rate of return for the Orange County Pool which was half again higher than comparable asset managers. Yet, he could truthfully say that the Pool was invested mostly or exclusively in U.S. Treasuries. He was able to do this because the margin requirement for Treasuries was only 10%. In the years of continually falling interest rates, hence continually rising Treasury prices, it was practical to buy Treasuries on a narrow margin and take a capital gain when they appreciated. Yet, in 1994 the Fed raised short term interest rates six times, causing bond prices to fall. In that case, buying bonds on margin is as disastrous as it had been profitable before. Citron couldn't meet the margin call and Orange County filed for bankruptcy protection. So, while it is important for CalPERS and CalSTRS to assume reasonable rates of return for their portfolios, it is at least as important for them to assume those rates of return at safe levels of associated risk. Otherwise, they'll give their pensioners what Citron gave Orange--a lemon. Harry Schell January 24, 2013 at 11:52 AM GASB finally wakes up and does (almost) what FASB did in the early 1980's, to require a legitimate rate of return limit and report current values of plan assets. This difference got the private sector to end defined benefit plans pretty much a long time ago. GASB is criminally slow, here. Tough Love January 24, 2013 at 10:54 AM Kurt Hahn, You miss the point. By this time the Public Sector Unions and most Public Sector workers know that their pensions are well underfunded and in jeopardy, but they also know that PAST service accruals have much greater "protection" than FUTURE service accruals. Much of the Union tactics today are simply stalling reform efforts to get as much of their excessive pension accrual into the PAST service column before it all collapses. Kurt Hahn January 24, 2013 at 10:42 AM PENSION REFORM NEEDED NOW ALONG WITH ATTENTION TO OBAMACARE COSTS DOWN THE ROAD If Governor Brown does not step forward with meaningful reforms of the CalPERS and CalSTRS pension plans the State could go the route of Greece. With the passage of Proposition 30 the Legislature seems to have a sense that nothing more needs to be done. When the State has to pick upthe cost of Obamacare Medical expansion in 2016 the revenue gain from Prop 30 will have to go the the Medical State match. Add to that the growing pension cost and the huge unfunded liability for State retirees health insurance we have big problems. Ron Ronglien January 23, 2013 at 7:07 PM This is good news, but we are stuck with Democrat's Socialist legislatures, but strict audits is a good start. The State cannot declare bankruptcy and the money will not come from the Marxist federalists in DC, so hopefully the Democrat/Unions will see the light and realize the money is not there and agree to a drastic reduction in their obscene retirement benefits. The feds can print money , but not the State of California. Just some thoughts. Stuart January 23, 2013 at 6:59 PM In Australia the UniSuper (a well run superfund) has come out and said that with the new lower interest environment and projected lower returns they will not be able to meet the defined benefits in the future. Government is urging more funds to come out and say the same thing. The can will be kicked down the road as far as Politicians can kick it, then at the final hour a new deal will be done. Pensions, like most debt will be defaulted on indirectly using massive inflation. If I was younger (50) I'd think about apprenticing in money printing equipment maintenance, as the babies will be run red hot to inflate away the problem. I may be wrong, but this is my view. False promises, avoided by inflation, halve the value of the pensions in real terms and they are affordable. John CPA JD January 23, 2013 at 10:10 AM Increasing the amount of liabilities on the balance sheet will only result in higher interest rates being demanded by bond purchasers, which will affect the current budget in terms of interest costs. It is not a big thing. eatingdogfood January 23, 2013 at 6:13 AM Democratic Hustler Politicians + Corrupt Greedy Unions = BANKRUPTCY BABY! Tough Love January 23, 2013 at 5:43 AM “L.A.’s a very blue city,” Nation says. “It’s not easy to do any meaningful reform. But the numbers are going to slap them in the face.” Worst .... ultimately the pension systems that are supposed to support hundreds of thousands of workers in their retirement will collapse .... all due to the grossly excessive promises and (to fend off the very much needed reform) the endless hiding of the real VERY high cost. Javier January 23, 2013 at 5:03 AM “L.A.’s a very blue city,” Nation says. “It’s not easy to do any meaningful reform. But the numbers are going to slap them in the face.” This is one of the reasons why people, if they are able to, are fleeing California in general and southern California in particular. |