From the print and online editions of the nation's premier urban-policy magazine http://www.city-journal.org/cj-comments.xml?story=8773 Manhattan Institute あなたが感謝している場合 [url=http://www.2013coachjapan.com/]コーチ 長財布[/url] 質の悪い袋全世界が実 [url=http://www.2014coachjapan.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] 際にその場合、あなたがにないので本 [url=http://www.2015coachjapan.com/]コーチ バッグ[/url] 当にその次の操作を選択 [url=http://www.2016coachjapan.com/]www.2013coachjapan.com/[/url] コーチ 長財布 はネイティブアメリカン [url=http://www.cheapcoachgirl.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] インドを持っていることシリーズ。"遊びの [url=http://www.cheapcoachgirl.com/]coach アウトレット[/url] ゴルフ財布本当にとして効 [url=http://www.cheapcoachgirl.com/]コーチ 財布[/url] 率機器の代わりにタイプ。調査ジュ [url=http://www.cheapcoachgirl.com/]www.cheapcoachgirl.com/[/url] コーチ 財布 ーシークチュールバッグ [url=http://www.coachtoyou.com/]coach アウトレット[/url] エンジョイ！あなたが選 [url=http://www.coachtoyou.com/]コーチ 財布[/url] 択したにあなたを支援するためにG [url=http://www.coachtoyou.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] Fだけのためにこの問題が表 [url=http://www.coachtoyou.com/]www.coachtoyou.com/[/url] コーチ 財布 示されます。 つかんモーメントは [url=http://www.coachjapanya.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] 一般上記の音は、筋 [url=http://www.coachjapanya.com/]コーチ 財布[/url] 肉群は通常内|あなたのそれぞれの|自分のあなたの残りの部分ために使用この物理構 [url=http://www.coachjapanya.com/]コーチ バッグ[/url] 造の逆さまその後後。 ジュエリー [url=http://www.coachjapanya.com/]www.coachjapanya.com/[/url] コーチ 財布 店によって引き受け、こ [url=http://www.annkacoachshop.com/]Coach 長財布[/url] のメソッドある今想像 [url=http://www.annkacoachshop.com/]コーチ 長財布[/url] を絶すると、彼らは本 [url=http://www.annkacoachshop.com/]Coach 時計[/url] 当に多くの人々は何人かの人々助けたのもののあなたの愛 [url=http://www.annkacoachshop.com/]www.annkacoachshop.com/[/url] Coach 長財布 所有へに向けて [url=http://www.coachse-rujp.com/]コーチファクトリー[/url] 見事なストラップを [url=http://www.coachse-rujp.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] 提示たい非常に独自寿命。それはコーチに [url=http://www.coachse-rujp.com/]コーチ 財布[/url] 有益なことができ、カットに [url=http://www.coachse-rujp.com/]www.coachse-rujp.com/[/url] コーチファクトリー 関する自分で、コーチアウトレットオンラインストアサイズ。 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#71039 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#71039 Tue, 21 May 2013 19:38:35 EDT あなたが感謝している場合 [url=http://www.2013coachjapan.com/]コーチ 長財布[/url] 安い袋全世界が実 [url=http://www.2014coachjapan.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] 際にあなたがしてないので本 [url=http://www.2015coachjapan.com/]コーチ バッグ[/url] 当に人物 [url=http://www.2016coachjapan.com/]www.2013coachjapan.com/[/url] コーチ 長財布 はネイティブアメリカン [url=http://www.cheapcoachgirl.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] あなたシリーズ。"遊びの [url=http://www.cheapcoachgirl.com/]coach アウトレット[/url] ゴルフ財布しばしばです通常ですとして効 [url=http://www.cheapcoachgirl.com/]コーチ 財布[/url] 率機器の代わりにタイプ。調査ジュ [url=http://www.cheapcoachgirl.com/]www.cheapcoachgirl.com/[/url] コーチ 財布 ーシークチュールバッグ [url=http://www.coachtoyou.com/]coach アウトレット[/url] エンジョイ！あなたが選 [url=http://www.coachtoyou.com/]コーチ 財布[/url] 択したにあなたを支援するためにG [url=http://www.coachtoyou.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] Fあなたのためにこの問題が表 [url=http://www.coachtoyou.com/]www.coachtoyou.com/[/url] コーチ アウトレット 示されます。 つかんモーメントは [url=http://www.coachjapanya.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] 一般上記の音は、筋 [url=http://www.coachjapanya.com/]コーチ 財布[/url] 肉群は頻繁にされる内|あなたのそれぞれの|自分のあなたの残りの部分ために使用この物理構 [url=http://www.coachjapanya.com/]コーチ バッグ[/url] 造の逆さま前にどの後。 ジュエリー [url=http://www.coachjapanya.com/]www.coachjapanya.com/[/url] コーチ 財布 店によって引き受け、こ [url=http://www.annkacoachshop.com/]Coach 長財布[/url] のメソッドあり想像 [url=http://www.annkacoachshop.com/]コーチ 長財布[/url] を絶すると、彼らは本 [url=http://www.annkacoachshop.com/]Coach 時計[/url] 当に多くの人々は何人かの人々助けた彼らの特定 [url=http://www.annkacoachshop.com/]www.annkacoachshop.com/[/url] Coach 長財布 にに向けて [url=http://www.coachse-rujp.com/]コーチファクトリー[/url] 見事なストラップを [url=http://www.coachse-rujp.com/]コーチ アウトレット[/url] 提示たい非常に独自寿命。それはコーチに [url=http://www.coachse-rujp.com/]コーチ 財布[/url] 有益なことができ、カットに [url=http://www.coachse-rujp.com/]www.coachse-rujp.com/[/url] コーチ アウトレット 関する一人で、コーチアウトレットオンラインストアカラット。 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#70871 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#70871 Sun, 19 May 2013 18:56:01 EDT Bork was not an originalist. If he were he would have advocated a reading of the Second Amendment that outlaws all firearms in private hands, except for muskets and single-shot pistols, for those are clearly the weapons the writers of the Constitution intended. They could not have intended to permit AK-47s and the like because they could not even conceive such weapons. One can intend only what one can conceive. http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#45212 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#45212 Mon, 24 Dec 2012 03:55:59 EST "Bon temps jolie," the only "specific legal result" Bork campaigned for was an honest judiciary. You haters seem to have no clue what "honest" even means. You can't cite those imaginary "unequivocally racist anti-integration writings," because they don't exist. You think that smearing a man's good name with blatant lies, while hiding in anonymity behind a pseudonym, is jolly good fun, but to decent people it's the lowest form of dishonesty. Why are liberals sooooo consistently dishonest, and sooooo relentlessly vicious? http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#45037 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#45037 Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:49:08 EST Didn't Judge Bork get into trouble with confirmation because he had been out campaigning for specific legal results for years and for specific changes to laws ??? Also because he was embarrassingly unequivocally racist in his anti-integration writings? http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#45023 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#45023 Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:12:22 EST Ned Flaherty, like the White Queen, apparently believes that words can mean whatever he wants them to mean. So if the U.S. Constitution contains no language protecting behaviors that were everywhere illegal when it was written, Flaherty calls it "especially vicious" for Bork to admit that fact and refuse to pretend otherwise. It is a fundamental premise of our American system of government that laws and legislators acquire their legitimacy by one means, and one means only: through "the consent of the governed." (Liberals like Ned: please go ahead and google that phrase.) We, the governed, have NOT given our jurists the authority to rewrite our Constitution and laws. We have democratic means for changing them, if they need changing. Our forefathers fought two wars against Great Britain to deprive autocrats of the ability to usurp the People's authority. But Ned Flaherty thinks that a panel of nine unelected autocrats should be able to pretend our Constitution and laws mean whatever they think it ought. I think Ned should move to some country that's governed his way: by a junta. Ned doesn't believe in the democratic process, but I do, and I thank God for Robert Bork's tireless work to strengthen American democracy. http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#44881 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#44881 Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:40:27 EST If the libs hadn't "borked" America's best-qualified jurist and legal scholar in 1987, Obama would now get to fill his seat on the SCOTUS. Serves 'em right. http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#44876 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#44876 Fri, 21 Dec 2012 04:23:54 EST Pretend what you want. Bork was rejected as an extremist, and for good reason. http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#44855 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#44855 Fri, 21 Dec 2012 03:06:41 EST This article refers to the “enormous success” of Judge Bork’s legacy. The facts prove otherwise. In cases involving citizens, government, and industry, Bork sided nearly always with first with industry and second with government, and he almost always sided against consumers, employees, and environmental activists. He repeatedly cited “moral order” and America’s “decadence” as his justification for opposing desegregation, privacy, and freedom of speech. Arguing that the right to free speech does not include art, literature, or editorials, he claimed that it applies only to politics. He was especially vicious toward LGBT people, and ruled in 1984 that “private, consensual sexual conduct is not constitutionally protected” �" whenever it involves homosexual people, precisely because they are homosexual, and because he treated homosexuals as not having the rights that everyone else does. He endorsed the most extreme right-wing views, denying both evolution theory in particular, and science in general. Very few call his legacy “successful” and most call it repudiated and rejected. http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#44854 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=8773#44854 Fri, 21 Dec 2012 02:33:01 EST