From the print and online editions of the nation's premier urban-policy magazine http://www.city-journal.org/cj-comments.xml?story=7180 Manhattan Institute zoroutracious www.kentuckytextiles.com/W3SVC919/index.php?hermes-cape-cod-watch-leather-attracted-many-people-for-long-time.html EnustyFut www.ktaeng.com/Resumes/index.php?/?louis-vuitton-classeur-louis-vuitton-coupons-online-codes_html/feed ByncfreexTync http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#72108 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#72108 Sun, 09 Jun 2013 06:47:58 EDT Vialbyclaxy hermes online bloomapoittee Navigate To This Web-site tougdohit http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70825 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70825 Sun, 19 May 2013 00:22:44 EDT Boildibicyday christian Louboutin pumps RafJetlefat Browse Around These Guys itatryhaH http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70807 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70807 Sat, 18 May 2013 18:34:41 EDT =this.defaultValue) http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70805 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70805 Sat, 18 May 2013 18:00:45 EDT unseriexknino goyard tote Nedsloubsrole goyard st louis price abusaradvassy http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70700 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70700 Fri, 17 May 2013 12:55:07 EDT updammida Coach Outlet RafJetlefat CLICK HERE To Find Out More itatryhaH http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70412 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70412 Tue, 14 May 2013 10:46:19 EDT updammida Louis Vuitton Store RafJetlefat Sneak A Peek At THIS Site itatryhaH http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70047 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#70047 Fri, 10 May 2013 01:35:39 EDT Why do you insist that we NEED economic growth, when we all know that living on a finite planet with fixed resources, we can't have our cake and eat it too? Why do you throw your arguments into doubt at the very end with unreasonable expectations that growth can- let alone should- continue as it has been for the future? http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#7024 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#7024 Sat, 11 Jun 2011 11:40:34 EDT @slowarren You are conflating projections for growth in real GDP and nominal GDP. Pawlenty called for a 5 percent real GDP trowth target. The OMB projections are for nominal growth, and include approximately a 2 percent inflation assumption, meaning they are projecting real growth a bit above 3 percent. Maybe a little aggressive, but not nearly as aggressive as Pawlenty. http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#7002 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#7002 Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:35:32 EDT I agree. All the talk has to be about what can we afford. Clearly we can't afford all we want. We can only afford what we can pay for WITHOUT borrowing another dime. Once we stop borrowing we can start paying down; what a concept. To our surprise we will discover we can't afford 40% of what we are buying; think America before Woodrow Wilson. http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#6988 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#6988 Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:06:42 EDT Mr. Barro, I couldn't agree more that Pawlenty's speech used an unrealistic future GDP number. However, Pawlenty is a piker. If you want to see unrealistic numbers, check out the Office of Management and Budget projections. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/Historicals/ Table 1.2 The executive branch office projects the 2011 GDP to be $15.0796T, and the 2016 GDP to be $19.7905T. By my calculation, that would require an average GDP growth of 5.21% per year over that six year period. Since the revised 1st quarter figures for this year (the first year of the OMB's projected figures) is 1.8% annual growth, even if the actual figure at the end of the year is 3.1% as projected by the Congressional Budget Office, it would require future growth to exceed 5.64% on average for the following five years. I don't know of anyone other than the President's people who is suggesting that the GDP growth in the next five years will be anything like that. Certainly that's far in excess of what the Congressional Budget Office is saying. Why don't you do an article on the Obama projections? http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#6973 http://www.city-journal.org/comments/index.php?story=7180#6973 Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:10:44 EDT