At her January inauguration, New York city council speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito told her colleagues, Now is the time to embrace our progressive moment and put our values into action. One of the Democrat-dominated councils first acts was to override former mayor Michael Bloombergs vetoes of bills from previous sessions. Then the 51-member legislative body got down to business: regulating the minutiae of New Yorkers lives, empowering city agencies to enter private property at will, and setting up task forces to study leisure activities.
At its semi-weekly stated meeting—where members pass bills and introduce new legislation—the council directed the Department of Health to develop a registry of convicted animal abusers, along the lines of the sex-offender registries that all states maintain. The registry would ensure that animal abusers cannot own animals for at least five years following their conviction or incarceration. Abusers will have to submit to annual reviews of their living situations, and pet stores and animal shelters will need to check the registry before selling an animal. Preventing animal abuse is a laudable goal, but the new law suffers from several deficiencies. For one thing, the Department of Health opposed its passage. The DOH has no enforcement capability or experience in monitoring criminals.
When Mayor Bloomberg vetoed the law last year, he criticized it for being so broad as to prohibit, at least in theory, someone convicted of animal neglect from petting a dog or living in the same house with a childs goldfish. Further, a grand total of 15 people in the state of New York were convicted of animal-abuse crimes in 2012, so the city will expend significant resources to monitor this tiny minority. Yet the council voted unanimously to override Bloombergs veto.
Meanwhile, Upper Manhattan councilmember Ydanis Rodriguez proposed a bill that would expand city workers authority to demand entry into many buildings. The bill, Intro 18, covers all buildings that receive tax benefits under Section 421-a of the tax code, which covers affordable housing. Councilmember Rodriguezs bill would allow representatives of any city agency to access any such building for any reason—and such request for access need not be made in writing.
Intro 18 doesnt specify which areas of a building must be made accessible to city employees, nor does it specifically limit the scope of the investigations. The bill comes with no memo explaining its intent, as is typically included when a bill makes its way through committee hearings. But one could reasonably imagine a scenario where an inspector wanted to check, say, if the affordable units in a rental building or co-op were outfitted with the same appliances and fixtures as market-rate units. According to the bills language, it appears the tenants or unit owners could be forced to open their doors to inspectors at any time. The potential for abuse is clear. Picture a series of minor administrative factotums waiting to have their palms greased to stave off endless inspections. Rodriguezs bill suggests a city where private property is a privilege that can be taken away by a bureaucrats will.
Another proposed law, Intro 8, addresses the grave problem of businesses claiming to be environmentally friendly. New Yorkers, a naïve and trusting group of rubes, apparently are getting snookered by greener-than-thou businesses. So much so that Brooklyn councilmember Vincent Gentile wants the city to establish an official environmentally friendly designation for which businesses can apply. The bills text calls for the Commissioner of Small Business Services to coordinate with the Department of Environmental Protection, the Department of Consumer Affairs, the Mayors Office of Long Term Planning and Sustainability and any other city agency or agencies that regulate businesses, to devise categories of environmentally friendly businesses and non-environmentally friendly businesses. Should this it really be a top priority for the city council?
Bronx councilmember Fernando Cabrera wants to rename the Washington Bridge (which spans the Harlem River) the David Dinkins Washington Bridge. The less said about that one, the better.
Perhaps topping them all, councilmember Ruben Wills of southeast Queens has submitted Intro 44, in relation to the creation of a task force on the sport of cricket. The bills multiple sub-sections and sub-sub sections describe the constitution of the task force and detail the making of appointments, filling of vacancies, and so on. After a year, the envisioned task force will deliver a report that shall include specific recommendations on the following topics: i. funding sources for team equipment, uniforms, and umpires; ii. promoting cricket in New York City; iii. potential economic development initiatives.
Crickets popularity in Pakistan, India, and Trinidad stems in part from the ease with which it can be played, pickup-style, with limited equipment: a ball, a bat, and some sticks for the wicket. Visit any playing field in central Brooklyn or eastern Queens and youll see plenty of people enthusiastically playing. Its not clear why the city needs a task force to brainstorm funding sources for an already popular pastime.
If these bills are exemplary of the city councils progressive values in action, New Yorkers should brace themselves for a steady stream of meddlesome intrusions into their private, professional, and recreational lives over the next four years.