A quarterly magazine of urban affairs, published by the Manhattan Institute, edited by Brian C. Anderson.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
The Regents, Stuck on Stupid
New Yorks statewide exams get a little dumber every year.
23 July 2008
A year ago, I wrote about the dumbing down of New York States Regents exams, the five tests in core subjects that students must pass to get a regular high school diploma. Since then, little has changedunless its that the exams have become even dumber. Look no further than this years United States History and Government exam for 11th-graders.
The test has three parts and a total of 75 points weighted and calculated to total 100 percent, in a Byzantine formula established in Albany. Fifty multiple-choice questions, along with 15 document-based questions, account for 65 of those points. The students raw score is then plotted on a conversion chart provided by the state in combination with the students score on two essays, which account for the total scores remaining ten points. If a student receives as few as 36 points out of 65 in the first two parts of the exam, he can still pass the Regents by earning five out of the ten essay points. According to the point-conversion chart, if he scores 50 points in the first two parts, he doesnt even have to answer an essay question to passbecause his overall grade is already a 65, the minimum passing grade. If youre confused by this elaborate scoring system, youre not alone. But the key point is that students who get fewer than half of the questions correct can pass. And this leniency applies to other Regents tests as well. Students taking the algebra exam, for instance, need only earn a raw score of 30out of a possible 87 pointsto pass.
Some might argue that the rigor of the examinations justifies this system of weighting scores. Thats laughable. Consider some of the questions on the history exam. The multiple-choice section features a political cartoon in which a Supreme Court justice points to a chart showing pictures of the three branches of government. The cartoon reads U.S. Constitution at the top and checks and balances at the bottom. The test question asks: Which constitutional principle is the focus of the cartoon? This is all too typical of the half-dozen graphs, maps, and cartoon questions in this section of the test.
The document-based questions account for another 15 points; information garnered from them is then incorporated into one of the essay questions. Students need no prior knowledge of American history to answer the questions successfully. For example, a picture of students outside Little Rock Central High School, where troops guard the schoolhouse doors, bears the caption: A white student passes through an Arkansas National Guard line as Elizabeth Eckford is turned away on September 4, 1957. A second photo of Elizabeth Eckford, a black student, reads, a mob surrounds Elizabeth Eckford outside Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas. The question asks the student to describe what happened to Eckford when she tried to attend Central High School! Another photo depicts the eventual resolution of the Little Rock standoff, when the military enforced desegregation rulings at President Eisenhowers command. The caption reads: On September 25, 1957 federal troops escort the Little Rock Nine to their classes at Central High School. The student is asked, Based on this photograph, what was the job of the United States Army troops in Little Rock, Arkansas?
The thematic essay requires students to discuss two people, other than presidents, who played significant roles that led to changes in the nations economy, government, or society. In case the students cant come up with any names, a list is provided: Margaret Sanger, Bill Gates, Henry Ford, César Chávez, Martin Luther King, Jr., Frederick Douglass, Andrew Carnegie, Jacob Riis, and Upton Sinclair. If thats not enough, the test even provides the nine peoples fields of endeavor.
An examination that neither requires a mastery of a body of knowledge nor demands the proper competence in reading and writing for its grade level measures nothing. However, it does perform a useful, albeit cynical, function: deceiving those who wish to be deceived. While some government officials pursue the content of our foods with a vengeancerestaurants in New York City may no longer use trans fats, and many are also required to display the number of calories in their foodothers seem to be busy manipulating the content of our kids exams in order to yield pleasing results. All the rhetoric calling for higher standards and improved teacher and student performance turns out to be nothing more than bluster. In the end, there is only one difficult question that the Regents exam poses: What does a student have to do to fail?
Marc Epstein was a contributor to A Consumers Guide to High School History Textbooks, edited by Diane Ravitch. He teaches history at Jamaica High School in New York City.